Unit Testing and Coding of PLC for Plant System I&C


Unit testing and Coding will be executed concurrently. It has been established that unit testing radically improves the robustness and reliability of the code generated. This means that each FC and FB must be tested autonomously. The architecture standard makes this simpler, as the core application has no straight external interface. So any block programmed interface in the core application can be substituted by a variable in sequence to imitate the behavior of the interface. Unit testing doesn’t need a official document. Though, if too many errors are detected during the validation phases, a test of official unit document may be asked by IO.

Simulated Validation Testing
The standard is to have a simulation test carried out before the test with the system associated. There are some reasons:
• The actual system does not constant must be associated/ready for activities of testing. Their life cycles can be desynchronized until link.
• As many functional problems as possible tracking before linking to the actual system. The software will be more established at the connection time, so fewer time will be lost in troubleshooting of software during testing the system.
• It will be probable to test the I&C in its integrality level when the systems have been acquired individually when the I&C is created of few controllers.
• If simulation is accessible, corrective and adaptive maintenance will be probable without having the connected of system.

This phase is possible, as it might not make many senses for systems of small plant. For systems of large plant with a lot of controllers, simulation will involve only low functionality level. The complex algorithms of development with multiple couplings is too time consuming and does not value added. Nevertheless, it is severely suggested. The simulator development and the control units development will be completed by different people. Therefore different understandings of how the system control should run will be brought face to face at an early project phase. The simulator will be linked to the controllers throughout the network field. It will read or write the variables of joint DB identified in the layer of controller simulation. These variables will substitute the real I/Os controller. There is no specification so far relating to the technology to be used for the simulator development, but the simulator will be sent to IO after FAT.

Integrated Validation Testing
This test will be performed during FAT and will be created with the connected of real system. Since some components may not be on hand during this phase, the strategy will be applied.

Hopefully this article can add your insights.
Please follow me:

ShareTo
Share on Facebook Tweet this Share to Google Plus Stumble this article
CLOSE

Enter Your Email Address




All Labels

  1. ABB PLC
  2. Allen Bradley PLC
  3. Analog Input
  4. Android
  5. Android and PLC
  6. Android Bluetooth
  7. Automatic Gates using PLC
  8. Baldor PLC
  9. Battery Level Indicator using PLC Analog
  10. BMS
  11. Building Management System
  12. Car Ticketing Machine using PLC
  13. CIMON PLC
  14. Click Series PLC
  15. Computer Vision
  16. Computer Vision and PLC
  17. Control Seven Segment Display with PLC
  18. Conveyor Control Using PLC
  19. CPU PLC
  20. CV and PLC
  21. CX-One
  22. DCS
  23. DDC
  24. DELMIA V5
  25. DeltaV
  26. Digital Input
  27. DirectLogic PLC
  28. DirectSOFT PLC
  29. Eaton PLC
  30. Elevator with PLC Program
  31. EPICS PLC
  32. Fatek PLC
  33. Festo PLC
  34. Fieldbus
  35. Forex Trading and PLC
  36. FPGA PLC
  37. GE Fanuc PLC
  38. GP proface
  39. GX Developer
  40. Heater Controller with PLC
  41. Hitachi PLC
  42. HMI
  43. Honeywell PLC
  44. IDEC PLC
  45. Keyence PLC
  46. Koyo PLC
  47. LG PLC
  48. Lock Unlock Door Using PLC
  49. Logixpro PLC
  50. Maple OIT
  51. Matsushita PLC
  52. MELSEC A
  53. MELSEC Q
  54. Memory PLC
  55. Micro PLC
  56. MicroSmart PLC
  57. Mitsubishi PLC
  58. Mobile Application
  59. Modbus
  60. Modicon PLC
  61. Momentum PLC
  62. Motion Control
  63. National Instruments PLC
  64. Omron PLC
  65. OPC
  66. PAC
  67. Panasonic PLC
  68. Parking Information using PLC
  69. Password Using PLC
  70. PLC
  71. PLC and CNC
  72. PLC and Computer
  73. PLC and Facebook
  74. PLC and PC
  75. PLC and Servo
  76. PLC Battery
  77. PLC Beginner Guide
  78. PLC Book
  79. PLC Cable
  80. PLC Codesys
  81. PLC Companies List
  82. PLC Computers
  83. PLC Design
  84. PLC for 3 Movement
  85. PLC for Assembly Line
  86. PLC for Automatic Welding
  87. PLC for Binding Machine
  88. PLC for Cutting Machine
  89. PLC for Filling Machine
  90. PLC for Fountain Application
  91. PLC for Injection Molding
  92. PLC for Marking
  93. PLC for Packing
  94. PLC for Rotary Bottle Washing
  95. PLC for Snack Vending Machine
  96. PLC for Sorter Machine
  97. PLC for Water Treatment
  98. PLC Hardware
  99. PLC Hybrid
  100. PLC Information
  101. PLC Knowledge
  102. PLC Language
  103. PLC Link Model
  104. PLC Mitsubishi Download
  105. PLC Model
  106. PLC Modules
  107. PLC Simulator
  108. PLC Software
  109. PLC Supplier
  110. PLC Types
  111. PLC Wiring
  112. PLC WorkShop
  113. PLC-ANALYZER
  114. PLCSIM
  115. Power Supply for PLC
  116. Profibus
  117. ProSafe PLC
  118. Push ON Push OFF with PLC
  119. Quickpanel Operator Interfaces
  120. RTU
  121. RTU and PLC
  122. SAS
  123. SCADA
  124. Schneider PLC
  125. SHARP PLC
  126. Siemens PLC
  127. SINUMERIK CNC
  128. Small Modular PLC
  129. Standard Sequence Programming for PLC
  130. Substation Automation System
  131. Teco PLC
  132. Telemetry
  133. TEP PLC
  134. Texas Instruments PLC
  135. Timer Countdown with PLC
  136. Toshiba PLC
  137. Touch Screen PLC
  138. Traffic Light with PLC
  139. TWIDO PLC
  140. Types of PLC
  141. Unitary PLC
  142. Unitronics PLC
  143. VIPA PLC
  144. Vision PLC
  145. Weighing Machine Using PLC
  146. Yokogawa PLC
  147. Zelio PLC

Search This Blog

Loading...
Copyright © 2009- All Rights Reserved