Software Testing Tool Integration of Personnel Safety System


Personnel Safety System or PSS system required fully automated testing for the integration of four tools of software-testing on two split computer platforms. The tools of software testing provided the functions as following:
1) PLC real-time I/O simulation,
2) HMI to the panels of users control,
3) GUI testing for applications of Windows-based,
4) Tracking of defect, test planning of graphical, and testing of batch,
5) PLCs of Allen Bradley verification of fault code, and
6) GE PLCs fault code verification.

The tools of software chosen to perform the system functions as above were:
1. HMI application of Programmable Industrial Control Simulation (PICS),
2. A functional test tool of WinRunner,
3. A graphical test planning tool of Test Director,
4. An download tool of Allen Bradley software and PLC5/30 fault code verifier of RSLogic, and
5. The software of Eclipse State logic of GE Fanuc PLC90/70 fault code verifier.

Modeling of Statistical
This article is not modeling software reliability but rather an application of some methods of SRE (software reliability engineering). Although the practitioner’s flag has been increased, it is still required to affirm some basic assumptions and situations that are typical of the SRE analysis. The analysis of reliability is efficiently possibility theory used to the failures modeling. The random variable concept is essential to possibility. The mainly general random changeable of interest to the reliability engineering field is the time to failure.

Usually, failure data is collected in two main formats: failures number per unit time and time between failures. The data gathered for this article falls in the count category of failure. These attributes are as follows:
• Domain is Time, either continuous or discrete.
• Category is the total failures number that can be practiced in immeasurable time is either limited or unlimited. The number distribution of the failures practiced by time “t”.
• Type is 2 vital types of statistical model that you reflect on are binomial and poisson.

The distribution of binomial failure has a permanent number of faults at the beginning, N, while for the alpha of Poisson type is the faults concluding number that could be exposed over an unlimited amount of time. It should be declared that for this analysis to have a realistic presentation, the software has to have developed to the point that extended changes are not being regularly finished. Appropriate any model to a specified data set engages definite limitations, not the smallest amount of which is being responsive of the theory underlying the fundamental model builds.

Article about »Software Testing Tool Integration of Personnel Safety System

Hopefully this article can add your insights.
Please follow me:

New Update: Snack Vending Machine Simulation

ShareTo
Share on Facebook Tweet this Share to Google Plus Stumble this article
CLOSE

Enter Your Email Address




All Labels

  1. ABB PLC
  2. Allen Bradley PLC
  3. Analog Input
  4. Automatic Gates using PLC
  5. Baldor PLC
  6. Battery Level Indicator using PLC Analog
  7. BMS
  8. Building Management System
  9. Car Ticketing Machine using PLC
  10. CIMON PLC
  11. Click Series PLC
  12. Control Seven Segment Display with PLC
  13. Conveyor Control Using PLC
  14. CPU PLC
  15. CX-One
  16. DCS
  17. DDC
  18. DELMIA V5
  19. DeltaV
  20. Digital Input
  21. DirectLogic PLC
  22. DirectSOFT PLC
  23. Eaton PLC
  24. Elevator with PLC Program
  25. EPICS PLC
  26. Fatek PLC
  27. Festo PLC
  28. Fieldbus
  29. FPGA PLC
  30. GE Fanuc PLC
  31. GP proface
  32. GX Developer
  33. Heater Controller with PLC
  34. Hitachi PLC
  35. HMI
  36. Honeywell PLC
  37. IDEC PLC
  38. Keyence PLC
  39. Koyo PLC
  40. LG PLC
  41. Lock Unlock Door Using PLC
  42. Logixpro PLC
  43. Maple OIT
  44. Matsushita PLC
  45. MELSEC A
  46. MELSEC Q
  47. Memory PLC
  48. Micro PLC
  49. MicroSmart PLC
  50. Mitsubishi PLC
  51. Modbus
  52. Modicon PLC
  53. Momentum PLC
  54. Motion Control
  55. National Instruments PLC
  56. Omron PLC
  57. OPC
  58. PAC
  59. Panasonic PLC
  60. Parking Information using PLC
  61. Password Using PLC
  62. PLC
  63. PLC and CNC
  64. PLC and Computer
  65. PLC and Facebook
  66. PLC and PC
  67. PLC and Servo
  68. PLC Battery
  69. PLC Beginner Guide
  70. PLC Book
  71. PLC Cable
  72. PLC Codesys
  73. PLC Companies List
  74. PLC Computers
  75. PLC Design
  76. PLC for 3 Movement
  77. PLC for Assembly Line
  78. PLC for Automatic Welding
  79. PLC for Binding Machine
  80. PLC for Cutting Machine
  81. PLC for Filling Machine
  82. PLC for Fountain Application
  83. PLC for Injection Molding
  84. PLC for Marking
  85. PLC for Packing
  86. PLC for Rotary Bottle Washing
  87. PLC for Snack Vending Machine
  88. PLC for Sorter Machine
  89. PLC for Water Treatment
  90. PLC Hardware
  91. PLC Hybrid
  92. PLC Information
  93. PLC Knowledge
  94. PLC Language
  95. PLC Link Model
  96. PLC Mitsubishi Download
  97. PLC Model
  98. PLC Modules
  99. PLC Simulator
  100. PLC Software
  101. PLC Supplier
  102. PLC Types
  103. PLC Wiring
  104. PLC WorkShop
  105. PLC-ANALYZER
  106. PLCSIM
  107. Power Supply for PLC
  108. Profibus
  109. ProSafe PLC
  110. Push ON Push OFF with PLC
  111. Quickpanel Operator Interfaces
  112. RTU
  113. RTU and PLC
  114. SAS
  115. SCADA
  116. Schneider PLC
  117. SHARP PLC
  118. Siemens PLC
  119. SINUMERIK CNC
  120. Small Modular PLC
  121. Standard Sequence Programming for PLC
  122. Substation Automation System
  123. Teco PLC
  124. Telemetry
  125. TEP PLC
  126. Texas Instruments PLC
  127. Timer Countdown with PLC
  128. Toshiba PLC
  129. Touch Screen PLC
  130. Traffic Light with PLC
  131. TWIDO PLC
  132. Types of PLC
  133. Unitary PLC
  134. Unitronics PLC
  135. VIPA PLC
  136. Vision PLC
  137. Weighing Machine Using PLC
  138. Yokogawa PLC
  139. Zelio PLC

Search This Blog

Loading...
Copyright © 2009- All Rights Reserved